<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Financial Theory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ltnielsen.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ltnielsen.com</link>
	<description>Lars Tyge Nielsen&#039;s website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 19:12:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Corrections and Revisions by LTN</title>
		<link>http://www.ltnielsen.com/1/book/corrections-and-revision/comment-page-1#comment-3847</link>
		<dc:creator>LTN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 19:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ltnielsen.com/?p=1#comment-3847</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Avery.

I think your question is whether I assume that the measure space is complete. I do not think I need to assume that.

A measure space is complete if every subset of a null set is a null set (which implies, in particular, that every subset of a null set is measurable). But I do not need that. I only need to know that every &lt;em&gt;measurable&lt;/em&gt; subset of a null set is a null set. Because a set like A triangle D is known to be measurable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Avery.</p>
<p>I think your question is whether I assume that the measure space is complete. I do not think I need to assume that.</p>
<p>A measure space is complete if every subset of a null set is a null set (which implies, in particular, that every subset of a null set is measurable). But I do not need that. I only need to know that every <em>measurable</em> subset of a null set is a null set. Because a set like A triangle D is known to be measurable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Corrections and Revisions by LTN</title>
		<link>http://www.ltnielsen.com/1/book/corrections-and-revision/comment-page-1#comment-3846</link>
		<dc:creator>LTN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ltnielsen.com/?p=1#comment-3846</guid>
		<description>Thanks Tahsin.

1. The symbol between the F&#039;s signifies neither set product nor measure product. It is the sigma-algebra product symbol as defined on page 321.

2. You are right. I am rewriting the book, and I will include this correction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tahsin.</p>
<p>1. The symbol between the F&#8217;s signifies neither set product nor measure product. It is the sigma-algebra product symbol as defined on page 321.</p>
<p>2. You are right. I am rewriting the book, and I will include this correction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Corrections and Revisions by Avery Fullerton</title>
		<link>http://www.ltnielsen.com/1/book/corrections-and-revision/comment-page-1#comment-1399</link>
		<dc:creator>Avery Fullerton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ltnielsen.com/?p=1#comment-1399</guid>
		<description>on page 422, proof of exercise A.5,  aren&#039;t you assuming that sigma algebra script F is complete?  You show A triangle D is contained in a null set, but A triangle D is not guaranteed null if script F is not complete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on page 422, proof of exercise A.5,  aren&#8217;t you assuming that sigma algebra script F is complete?  You show A triangle D is contained in a null set, but A triangle D is not guaranteed null if script F is not complete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pricing and Hedging of Derivative Securities by LTN</title>
		<link>http://www.ltnielsen.com/comment-page-1#comment-934</link>
		<dc:creator>LTN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ltnielsen.com/?page_id=3#comment-934</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Amish!
---Lars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Amish!<br />
&#8212;Lars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pricing and Hedging of Derivative Securities by Amish Haria</title>
		<link>http://www.ltnielsen.com/comment-page-1#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator>Amish Haria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ltnielsen.com/?page_id=3#comment-932</guid>
		<description>Hi Lars

I am a masters student in applied finance in Australia and I would just like to show you my gratitude as you have successfully showed me how to understand nd1 and nd2 in the BS model. Many papers and sites are too hard to understand but your brief paper has finally done it it a very simplistic nature. You have save me a lot of time and I thank you. 

Keep up the good work.


Amish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lars</p>
<p>I am a masters student in applied finance in Australia and I would just like to show you my gratitude as you have successfully showed me how to understand nd1 and nd2 in the BS model. Many papers and sites are too hard to understand but your brief paper has finally done it it a very simplistic nature. You have save me a lot of time and I thank you. </p>
<p>Keep up the good work.</p>
<p>Amish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Corrections and Revisions by Tahsin Alam</title>
		<link>http://www.ltnielsen.com/1/book/corrections-and-revision/comment-page-1#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Tahsin Alam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ltnielsen.com/?p=1#comment-236</guid>
		<description>1. p326, Prop A.10
The symbol between the F&#039;s should be the set product symbol, not the measure product symbol.

2. p328, Section A.3
&quot; ... the expression a&lt;&lt;b means that a_i &lt; b_i for every i=1,...,n&quot;
The last character should be k, not n.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. p326, Prop A.10<br />
The symbol between the F&#8217;s should be the set product symbol, not the measure product symbol.</p>
<p>2. p328, Section A.3<br />
&#8221; &#8230; the expression a&lt;&lt;b means that a_i &lt; b_i for every i=1,&#8230;,n&quot;<br />
The last character should be k, not n.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

